{"id":14789,"date":"2015-07-23T15:55:08","date_gmt":"2015-07-23T15:55:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/?p=14789"},"modified":"2015-07-23T15:55:08","modified_gmt":"2015-07-23T15:55:08","slug":"imo-guber-tribunal-verdict-okorocha-floors-ihedioha-lawyer-fails-to-pay-n300-charge-fee-as-pdp-candidate-heads-to-appeal-court-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/?p=14789","title":{"rendered":"Imo Guber Tribunal Verdict Okorocha Floors Ihedioha Lawyer Fails To Pay N300 Charge Fee As PDP Candidate Heads To Appeal Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/?attachment_id=14790\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-14790\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/hammeer1.jpg\" alt=\"hammeer\" width=\"600\" height=\"357\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-14790\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/hammeer1.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/hammeer1-300x179.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nBy By Victor Madumere<br \/>\nThe Hon Justice David Wyon led election Petition Tribunal Panel sitting in Owerri yesterday at the Owerri High Court dismissed the election petition EPT\/IM\/GOV\/3\/2015 filed by  the Imo State Peoples Democratic Party PDP Guber candidate, Rt Hon Emeka Ihedioha challenging the election of  governor Rochas Okorochas of the All Progressive Congress APC in the 2015 Imo guber election.<br \/>\nAfter postponing the ruling  twice the panel finally gave  the ruling  yesterday  in favour  of Gov Rochas Okorocha&#8217;s motion of application to dismiss the petition for filing pre-hearing notice outside  stipulated time of seven  (7) days which is one  of the two grounds presented  in the motion.<br \/>\nDelivering  the ruling, the panel chairman Justice Wyon considered all submissions, affidavits, and arguments with the accompanied authorities presented to the Panel by  both petitioners counsel and  respondents counsel, although  he agreed with one of the  authorities that payment for fillings  at the registry is  for administrative records dismissing petitioner\u2019s argument that fees are not compulsory. That  is why a  certain supreme Court Judgment stated that pre-hearing  notice could  be  made orally  which  implies that  oral application cannot be assessed into monetary value.<br \/>\nJustice Wyon went further to rule that  the time of payment has been considered by the panel as the real time of filling .<br \/>\nIn that case  the record has  it that  the filling was truly made  on the 23rd of June 2015 while  the  payment  of  three hundred naira N300 was made on  the 3rd of July 2015. According to him inspite the necessary responses  on the filed document by  the respondents, the document is considered to be received by  the registry  on 23\/6\/15  but  was filed properly  at  the payment on 3rd July 2015 which is outside the stipulated  days.<br \/>\nOn the above grounds the panel dismissed the petition for filling of pre hearing notice out of time.<br \/>\nThe respondent counsel  Adeniyi Akuntola SAN thanked  the panel for what he described as a landmark ruling.<br \/>\nSpeaking outside the court room after the ruling the lead counsel to  the petitioner Chief Mike Ahamba SAN told newsmen that what he witnessed in the ruling was what  he  has  not seen or heard  of in his 41 years of legal practice, where appeal court judgements supercedes supreme court judgments.<br \/>\nChief Mike Ahamba has this to say; \u201cWhat happened in Court was that there were three motions to be decided. One had to do with filing pre hearing application, the other had to do with striking out the reply filed by the Gov and the APC as being incompetent process before the court and another one was an effort to amend that process which we said was a void process they were conceding. That all was not well with the process but the court decided to rule on the pre hearing notice application on the ground that the application notice was a jurisdictional matter. That was a surprise to me because the three Supreme Court authorities i cited stated clearly that it was not jurisdictional. For the Court of Appeal to have been used to override a Supreme Court decision as recent as 2013 and 2014 is a surprise to me.<br \/>\nFor the Tribunal to have overruled Supreme Court authorities on the issue of whether application for prehearing was jurisdictional. It was based on that, that the Tribunal opted to hear the application to dismiss our petition for abandonment because it was jurisdictional, well that&#8217;s alright. The Tribunal has ruled and we said as the court pleases but I have come out and received a telephone instruction by my client to proceed to the court of appeal and I intend to do so because the word abandonment has lost its meaning if a petition that has gone through pre hearing session in which all parties participated can now be said to have been abandoned. It then means i don&#8217;t know the meaning of abandonment again maybe at the Court of Appeal we will get a proper definition of abandonment. This is the position.<br \/>\nIt is law that the rule of court does not create jurisdiction. The thing they were complaining about is Paragraph 18:1 of the rule guiding election petition proceedings and the Supreme Court has said that it does not raise a jurisdiction question but the Tribunal in Owerri says it does. The Supreme Court said it can even be done orally but they overruled the Supreme Court saying it cannot be done orally. There is nothing I can do but to go and complain at the Court of Appeal.<br \/>\nAs at when due means something had been paid. Throughout that ruling did you hear him say Paragraph so so so, rule so so said money should be paid? So if I did what ought to have been done after every other thing had been done, why then do you talk about not being done as at when due. In any case, this motion was pending before we started pre hearing: Why did we start prehearing? If the application for pre hearing was incompetent, the motion to strike it out to say it was incompetent was already pending before the tribunal, why did we go through the rigours of prehearing and then adjourned for report of prehearing before it now recognised that it was an incompetent process? That is what I want to take to the Court of Appeal for determination because I can&#8217;t overrule them: I can&#8217;t even say they are wrong but I will go to a higher court to see if they are right or wrong.<br \/>\nThe judgement is valid but I tell you, I am embarrassed by it as a Senior Lawyer in my 41 years of practice.<br \/>\nI still have confidence in the judiciary and I will continue to have confidence because if I hadn&#8217;t confidence I wouldn&#8217;t have approached them in the first instance\u201d. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By By Victor Madumere The Hon Justice David Wyon led election Petition Tribunal Panel sitting<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14789","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-frontpage"],"featured_image_urls":{"full":"","thumbnail":"","medium":"","medium_large":"","large":"","1536x1536":"","2048x2048":"","elegant-magazine-featured":"","elegant-magazine-medium":"","elegant-magazine-medium-small":"","elegant-magazine-thumbnail-small":""},"author_info":{"info":["Imo Trumpeta"]},"category_info":"<a href=\"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/?cat=3\" rel=\"category\">Frontpage<\/a>","tag_info":"Frontpage","comment_count":"0","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14789","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14789"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14789\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14791,"href":"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14789\/revisions\/14791"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14789"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14789"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imotrumpeta.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14789"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}